Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump Administration’s Federal Wetlands Regulations Rule
Bilzin Sumberg Publication
Client Alert
August 31, 2021
Yesterday, a federal judge vacated the Trump Administration's Navigable Waters Protection Rule (“NWPR”) that had narrowed the scope of federal jurisdiction over wetlands. The order, from the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, applies nationwide and brings a swift end to the NWPR, even as the Biden administration has begun the process of reworking the regulation. Judge Rosemary Marquez found “fundamental, substantive flaws” with the NWPR and said that it was in conflict with the 1972 Clean Water Act. She warned of the “possibility of serious environmental harm” if the NWPR remained in place.
Agencies must now enforce an earlier 1986 rule, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2006 Rapanos v. United States decision (and its “significant nexus” test), which imposes more expansive federal jurisdiction over wetlands than the NWPR. Based on its far-reaching consequences, that will impact a variety of industries and federal and state regulatory agencies, it is very likely that the order will be appealed and a stay requested, though the possible success or timeliness of that request cannot be accurately evaluated at this time. The Arizona case included numerous intervening parties, including among others, the National Sand, Stone, and Gravel Association, who have standing to file such an appeal.
Agencies must now enforce an earlier 1986 rule, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2006 Rapanos v. United States decision (and its “significant nexus” test), which imposes more expansive federal jurisdiction over wetlands than the NWPR. Based on its far-reaching consequences, that will impact a variety of industries and federal and state regulatory agencies, it is very likely that the order will be appealed and a stay requested, though the possible success or timeliness of that request cannot be accurately evaluated at this time. The Arizona case included numerous intervening parties, including among others, the National Sand, Stone, and Gravel Association, who have standing to file such an appeal.
Related Practices
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Bilzin Sumberg is pleased to announce that 32 of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America, with three additional attorneys named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.
New York City's new pied-à-terre tax imposes up to 6.5% annual surcharges on high-value NYC homes not used as a primary residence. A court order has paused rollout, but Florida residents and foreign owners should act now to review exposure and structuring options.
This article provides practical guidance for mortgage loan sellers and originators evaluating, responding to, and negotiating repurchase demands. It outlines steps sellers can take to respond without waiving any rights under a loan purchase agreement.

