Skip to main content

Salmon Price-Fixing Litigation Survives Dismissal

Lori Lustrin

On March 26, 2021, Southern District of Florida District Court Judge Cecilia Altonaga denied a motion to dismiss an antitrust class action alleging a conspiracy to fix the price of farm-raised Atlantic salmon globally.[1]

According to the Plaintiffs’ Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, the Defendants engaged in a conspiracy to increase salmon prices by manipulating the NASDAQ Salmon Index that provides weekly spot market pricing for salmon in Norway.[2]   The NASDAQ Salmon Index was created in 2013 when the conspiracy is alleged to have begun.[3]  Because the majority of the world’s salmon comes from Norway, the NASDAQ Salmon Index serves as the benchmark for salmon pricing around the world.[4]

Defendants are alleged to have coordinated to have their subsidiaries make spot market purchases at supra-competitive prices, thereby creating the appearance of greater consumer demand, which in turn drove the Index price upward.[5]  This allowed Defendants to charge artificially high prices globally.[6]

The Court held that that the allegations of increased index prices, parallel price movements, and record profits during the class period were sufficient to allege Defendants’ “shift from competition to cooperation”[7]  when considered with other circumstantial evidence of a conspiracy.[8]  For example, the Complaint alleges that salmon prices rose notwithstanding declining production costs and a decrease in demand due to a Russian import ban.[9] The Complaint further alleges that the Salmon producer Defendants had access to one another’s confidential pricing data through mutual participation in industry trade associations.[10]  The Court also noted the ongoing parallel antitrust investigations by the European Commission and Department of Justice.[11]

We will continue to monitor and provide updates on this case and others relevant to our food and beverage clients.

[[1] In re Farm-Raised Salmon and Salmon Prods. Antitrust Litig., S.D. Fla. Case No. 1:19-cv-21551, ECF No. 307 (Order).
[2] In re Farm-Raised Salmon and Salmon Prods. Antitrust Litig., S.D. Fla. Case No. 1:19-cv-21551, ECF No. 251-1 (Second Amended Consolidated Complaint) at 3.
[3] Id. at 35.
[4] Id. at 34.
[5] Id. at 40.
[6] Id.
[7] Id. at 27.
[8] Order, at 33.
[9] Second Amended Consolidated Complaint, at 63.
[10] Id. at 49.
[11] Order, at 33.]

Press Release June 5, 2023
Bilzin Sumberg is pleased to announce that Antitrust Partners Robert W. Turken, Scott N. Wagner, and Lori P. Lustrin have been recognized in Law360’s Legal Lions of the Week, which highlights weekly major litigation wins across the country that have industry-wide implications.
The Food Court Blog October 28, 2020
On Monday, October, 19, 2020, Northern District of Illinois Judge Virginia M. Kendall denied three motions to dismiss a putative class action alleging that the nation’s leading turkey suppliers—including Butterball, Cargill, House of Raeford, Tyson, and Perdue—engaged in a conspiracy to fix the pric...
The Food Court Blog October 26, 2020
As the Bilzin Sumberg team previously reported in June 2020, the Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted four executives from Pilgrim’s Pride and Claxton Poultry for their participation in a conspiracy to fix prices and rig bids of broiler chicken products. That indictment alleged that from at least 20...