Skip to main content

Are We Done With B2B Lawsuits About Residential Mortgages From the 2000s?

Philip R. Stein
Blog Image2021 provided some long-awaited new exit ramps off the long and winding road of business vs. business residential mortgage litigation stemming from the 2007–08 financial crisis. A multitude of recent settlements has left that road far less congested than at any time in the last decade. Whether it will soon be abandoned entirely or instead re-paved and heavily traveled once again is not yet certain.

At the outset of the past year, there remained a significant number of active lawsuits, most of which dated back to 2016, between Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI) and individual mortgage originators (correspondent lenders). In March 2021, LBHI even added dozens of new cases to the total, filing lawsuits against mortgage brokers and other small players. Whether being sued for the first time in their company’s history or having already weathered multiple “mortgage put-back” and contractual indemnification lawsuits, the defendants in all of these LBHI cases had reason to fear that their cases would not be resolved for another two to three years. 

A confluence of factors — most notably, demonstrations by defendants of their abilities to mount strong factual and legal defenses and a business-minded approach taken by LBHI in settlement discussions — led to resolutions of all but a few of these cases by the end of 2021. Our team at Bilzin Sumberg negotiated resolutions for approximately 30 clients sued by LBHI over the last few years, with about 20 of the case dismissals coming between the fourth quarter of 2020 and year-end 2021. Though the terms of the negotiated resolutions are confidential, one consequence of the settlements is that there is no prospect of future litigation between LBHI (or its affiliates) and the mortgage companies (or their affiliates) with respect to anything that occurred prior to the settlement date. 

Coming on the heels of resolutions of previous waves of lawsuits filed by ResCap, CitiMortgage, Aurora, and other mortgage aggregators, the termination of the vast majority of the LBHI cases may herald an end at long last to litigation about residential mortgages originated and sold prior to 2008. There remains some uncertainty about that, however. JPMorgan Chase (often acting on behalf of EMC Mortgage) and the FDIC as Receiver for Washington Mutual have each made payment demands in recent years on numerous correspondents but have thus far filed no lawsuits of which we are aware related to those outstanding demands. (We defended, and resolved in 2020, cases brought by Chase/EMC against clients of ours, but are aware of no similar suits filed since then).
Correspondents and brokers have earned the right to be rid forever of lawsuits pointing fingers at them — with more than a little revisionist history — about loans originated so many years ago. Let’s hope their current peace remains undisturbed.
Publication April 04, 2018
Banks and other financial institutions might reasonably have expected that, 10 years after the collapse of Bear Stearns and the demise of Lehman Brothers, they would finally be free and clear of lawsuits spawned by the financial crisis.That has not come to pass.
Financial Services Watch Blog April 12, 2016
Calling the settlement a reproach for “years of reckless underwriting” at Wells Fargo, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan announced on April 8th that Wells Fargo & Co. formally reached a record $1.2 billion settlement of a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit. A notable feature o...
Client Alert May 24, 2023
Over the past year, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank has filed a number of lawsuits against individual mortgage companies and mortgage brokers in connection with indemnification claims focused on residential mortgages that were originated before...