Public-Private Partnerships: Opportunities & Challenges for the Construction Industry

ABA Section of Litigation - Construction Litigation Committee
Speaking Engagement
April 22, 2021

Adrian K. Felix, as moderator, and Felix X.Rodriguez, as a panelist, participate in a discussion titled Public-Private Partnerships: Opportunities & Challenges for the Construction Industry as part of an American Bar Association Section of Litigation Construction Committee event. Participants discussed public-private partnerships, distinctions between public and private construction projects, risks associated with the procurement process, and common contractural requirements relating to performance bonds, workforce requirements, public record laws, and reporting and audit rights.

Key takeaways from the discussion, include

  1. P3’s are used as a way to provide private financing sources to public entities, and help get projects accomplished that might not ordinarily be accomplished because they are either too large or economically unattractive without both private and government involvement.

  2. Toll road projects are what many people visualize when thinking of a P3 project, but P3’s are not limited to toll road projects. You may find other projects with a public purpose being delivered with the P3 model, such as passenger rail, seaport, courthouse, and mixed-use projects.

  3. For the private participants, P3 projects are typically more risky, but provide a potentially greater financial upside. The private participants in the P3 typically take on more risk than in other types of public projects (i.e. expect less relief for weather impacts, environmental impacts, etc.).

  4. For the public participants, in addition to tapping into different funding, the P3 process may facilitate more innovation and a holistic long term balancing of cost of construction versus cost to maintain over the expected life span of the asset.

  5. Expect additional layers and sources of financial security such as irrevocable letters of credit, parent guarantees, payment and performance bonds, and supply bonds. These financial security instruments need to be carefully crafted to be appropriately limited in scope.

  6. Due to the length of time to get a proposed P3 from concept to approval, it is important that the private participants understand that there may be limited ability to pass on price increases during this period; therefore, private participants should factor in price increase risk into their financial model.

  7. Expect P3 projects to be the source of case law development, including as to whether private entities working at the direction of a public entity enjoy the benefits of the public entities’ sovereign immunity. Expect that the nature of a P3 project will add additional layers of complexity to the analysis than that of a public project.

  8. P3 projects are unlike other public projects which are either construction projects or design build projects. P3 projects may involve financing, designing, building, and post- construction operation and maintenance. Those roles may be shared between various project participants in different ways depending on the particular set up of the P3 project.

 


RELATED PEOPLE
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Press Release October 16, 2023
The 2024 edition of Benchmark Litigation has once again ranked Bilzin Sumberg as “Highly Recommended” in the category of Florida Dispute Resolution Firms, in addition to recognizing several firm partners.
Press Release August 11, 2023
Litigation Partners Kenneth Duvall, Jake Greenberg, and Lori Lustrin have been named in Benchmark Litigation’s 40 & Under list.
Press Release January 26, 2023
Bilzin Sumberg is proud to announce it has been awarded the 2023 Chief Justice’s Law Firm Commendation Pro Bono Service Award in recognition of the firm’s outstanding efforts in support of pro bono services in the state of Florida.
VIEW MORE