Skip to main content

Indemnification Rights for Fannie and Freddie Leads to Ironic Defense from SEC Charges

Robert M. Siegel

On December 16, 2011, the SEC filed two separate suits charging securities fraud by three former top executives from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, respectively. Both suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and allege that the executives knew and approved of 1) making misleading statements that the companies’ subprime exposure was substantially smaller than it really was, and 2) understating the level of risk. The SEC is seeking financial penalties, disgorgement of gains with interest, permanent injunctive relief, and officer and director bars against the individual executives.

The SEC leveled charges at a predictable target, following widespread criticism for not penalizing top executives for reckless actions that triggered the 2008 market crisis. A real question remains, however, as to whether any other culpable individuals from the too-big-to-fail banks will be held accountable.

In addition, a recent report issued by the Inspector General of the Federal Housing Finance Agency says that both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have paid more than $109 million in legal expenses for former executives since 2004. The report recommends that standard legal billing practices should be developed for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in addition to expanding oversight of such expenses in order to control costs. Ultimately, because of the broad indemnification rights given to the executives of Fannie and Freddie, the companies are covering the legal costs of each executive. Ironically, the government on the one hand is prosecuting these individuals while on the other hand, it is paying for their defense.

Development Conference March 15, 2023
Suzanne M. Amaducci and keynote speaker Jeff Krasnoff, Chief Executive Officer of Rialto Capital Management, discuss the state of real estate debt markets amid ongoing economic uncertainty at Bilzin Sumberg’s 4th Annual Development Conference.
Blog November 2, 2022
As claims based on pre-2008 loans sold and securitized in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) trusts are still being resolved, industry analysts are bracing for a new wave of indemnification claims and put-back attempts. Credit Suisse Securities and Bank of America have both agreed to make...
Blog February 18, 2022
Last week, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dealt a major blow to mortgage investors in two parallel actions pending for the past few years. The impact proved to be fatal to one of the actions, which was dismissed in its entirety. The other one was barely left standing. ...