Skip to main content

Are Mortgage Repurchase Demands a Case of Revisionist History?

Financial Services Blog

Financial Services Watch Blog
October 04, 2012

As we noted in a previous blog post, we believe that big aggregators of residential mortgage loans are attempting to revise history when they claim that they believed all along that all risk of borrower misrepresentations fell on correspondents.

We expand on this idea, and comment further on repurchase claims generally, in the article that we authored for The Scotsman’s Guide.

RELATED PEOPLE
Philip R. Stein

Philip R. Stein

Partner, Litigation Practice Group Leader
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Financial Services Watch Blog December 17, 2020
One would think that, as we approach 2021, litigation related to residential mortgage loans originated and sold well over a decade ago would be ancient history. Nevertheless, some suits filed years ago remain active, and, even more surprisingly (and disturbingly), new lawsuits related to loans sold ...
Publication December 8, 2020
The economic havoc wreaked by COVID-19 may have the knock on effect of a wave of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) litigation, mirroring the deluge of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) litigation following the 2008 financial crisis. 
VIEW MORE